Home > species > Phragmipedium Species

Phragmipedium caudatum (Lindl.) Rolfe 1896 (Kew)


Comment

You must login to add your comment. Tell us about your experience with this species, its description, growing condition, flowering season, or other species it is easily mistaken for. If you see any photo that may have been misidentified please tell us. Be specific and include id of the photo(s) you address.

Go to full list

  • Thank you Marcos

    : Nov. 21, 2018, 9:31 a.m.
  • [28594] Hi. This is Phragmipedium popowii, not caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:08 a.m.
  • [50586] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:08 a.m.
  • [50585] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:07 a.m.
  • [50584] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:07 a.m.
  • [50583] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:07 a.m.
  • [178473] Hi. This is Phragmipedium popowii, not caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:06 a.m.
  • [19101] [10616] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. It does not have long petals. The bag is different, without carrying on the top the particular "hairs" of the caudatum. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a union of richteri by another phragmipedium.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:05 a.m.
  • [37871] Hi. This phragmipedium is wallisi. The shape of the bag is typical of the wallisii, besides having the hue of some wallisiis found in Peru.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:05 a.m.
  • [19102] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:02 a.m.
  • [5266] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:01 a.m.
  • [10616] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. The petals still do not have the diameter of the caudatum. The bag is different, without carrying the particular "hairs" of the caudatum, in addition to having a different color. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a hybrid of caudatum.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 5:01 a.m.
  • [19100] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. It does not have long petals. The bag is different, without carrying on the top the particular "hairs" of the caudatum. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a union of richteri by another phragmipedium.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 4:53 a.m.
  • [10616] Hi. This phragmipedium is not caudatum. It does not have long petals. The bag is different, without carrying on the top the particular "hairs" of the caudatum. The registration is incorrect. It seems to be a union of richteri by another phragmipedium.

    : Oct. 2, 2018, 4:52 a.m.